- Mini review
- Open Access
Endocytosis and transcytosis of gliadin peptides
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics volume 3, Article number: 8 (2016)
Celiac disease (CD) is a frequent inflammatory intestinal disease, with a genetic background, caused by gliadin-containing food. Some gliadin peptides are not digested by intestinal proteases and can have different biological effects. Gliadin peptides can induce innate and adaptive T cell-mediated immune responses. The major mediator of the stress and innate immune response to gliadin peptides (i.e., peptides 31–43 and 31–55) is the cytokine interleukin-15 (IL-15). Other peptides such as the 33 mer containing the P57–68 sequence, after tissue transglutaminase deamidation, are well presented to T cell in the intestine and can induce an adaptive immune response.
In this paper, we review the recent studies on the digestion of gliadin and the peptides released by the digestion process. We will also discuss the mechanisms responsible for the internalization and transcytosis of indigested gliadin peptides in the intestinal epithelium.
Gliadin is not completely digested by the intestinal proteases producing bioactive peptides that have different biological effects. These peptides are internalized in the cells by an active process of endocytosis and can traverse the intestinal mucosa with different kinetics and immunological effects. In vivo findings will also be discussed.
Celiac disease (CD) is a common enteropathy induced by ingestion of wheat gluten proteins and related prolamins from oat, rye, and barley in genetically susceptible individuals. The genetic predisposition is characterized by the presence of human leucocytes antigen (HLA)-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 molecules in virtually all CD patients . The main toxic components of gluten belong to a family of closely related proline- and glutamine-rich proteins called gliadin. This is a heterogeneous mixture of proteins that can be assigned to three major groups (i.e., α/β-, γ-, and ω-gliadins) . The high percentage of proline residues makes gliadin resistant to gastric–pancreatic and intestinal digestive proteases, so that long gliadin fragments can reach high concentration levels in the gut epithelium [3, 4].
To date, a very high number of gluten peptides, deriving from α- and γ-gliadins, and recently from glutenins, have been reported to stimulate cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4)+ T lymphocytes isolated from the small intestinal mucosa of CD patients . Although at least 50 T cell stimulatory gluten epitopes in native or deamidated form have been identified, the 33-mer peptide is considered the most immunogenic including six overlapping epitopes. The 33-mer peptide, released from recombinant α2-gliadin (Swiss-Prot accession number: Q9M4L6) through gastric–pancreatic enzyme digestion, is highly resistant to further digestion by intestinal brush border enzymes (brush border membranes (BBM)) . Hence, it has been suggested that the 33-mer could reach the underlying lamina propria (LP) and, following deamidation, can play a central role in the pathogenic cascade of CD by activating the adaptive immune response.
More recently, attention has been directed to the possible involvement of innate immune mechanisms in CD . In particular, it has been showed that the synthetic peptide α-gliadin 31–43 (LGQQQPFPPQQPY) is able to up-regulate the expressions of interleukin (IL)-15 on CaCo-2 cells surface-induced epithelial cell proliferation and IL-6 production . The sequence 31–43 is comprised of a larger peptide 25 mer (P31–55) together with the slightly longer P31–49 have been deeply studied in the last years .
These observations indicate that in addition to its interactions with dendritic cells and T lymphocytes of the lamina propria, gliadin has a dual effect on the intestinal epithelium of CD patients, both activating the innate and the adaptive immune response through a different set of gliadin peptides.
In the present study, we will review the recent literature about how these active gliadin peptides can be generated by digestion and mainly how they are transported in the enterocytes and through the epithelium in vitro and ex vivo systems.
Gliadin peptides digestion
Gliadin is a protein difficult to digest . Several studies have approached the issue of gliadin digestibility in different systems. Recent studies have considered the digestion of a recombinant α-gliadin Q9ZP09. The in vitro digests of the recombinant protein produced a number of peptides, but supplementation with BBM greatly simplified the digests leaving two main peptides, the 25-mer peptide 31–55 and the 33-mer. Incubation of the synthetic 25 mer with BBM enzymes for longer reaction times confirmed its high resistance to proteolytic enzymes. Surprisingly, in the same system, the immuno-active epitope for the adaptive T cell-mediated immune response (P56–68), also included within gliadin Q9ZP09 sequence, was partly digested by gastric/pancreatic enzymes and completely digested after BBM supplementation. Indicating that gliadin Q9ZP09 was extensively hydrolyzed in vitro while the peptide sequence stimulating the innate response (P31–55) in CD was unaffected . More recently, the same group analyzed the digestion of common pasta (Triticum durum semolina), using a sophisticated in vitro multi-compartment model that included oral, gastric, and duodenal phases of digestion . Interestingly, the digestion of the cooked pasta showed the persistence of several wheat-derived peptides identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry that included a-gliadin 31–55 and the shortened form a-gliadin 31–43 (Fig. 1). These studies demonstrate that these gliadin peptides can really come into contact with the intestinal epithelium in our everyday life and that in vitro studies using them have a physiologic rationale. Moreover, these data indicate that digestion of the P31–43 (or -49 or 25-mer) sequence is very difficult, implying that its biological activity can be central to the CD pathogenesis. An immediate application of these observation would be to find cereals that are deprived of the most indigested peptides to use in the CD patients diet or to find ways to process gluten-containing produces as to render them deprived of the host-indigested peptides.
Gliadin peptides P31–43 and P57–68 enter the cells by an active process
Gliding peptides enter the cells by endocytosis. In fact, their entrance into the cells requires 37 °C temperature and Ca++ in the media . Experiments with an inhibitor of endocytosis (methyl-β-cyclodextrin, M-β-CD) reduced the entrance of P31–43 labeled with a fluorescent tail such as lissamine (liss). Interestingly, the entrance of P31–43-liss was unaffected by filipin, an inhibitor of lipid raft/caveolae-mediated endocytosis. The opposite effect was generated by these inhibitors on P57–68-liss, indicating that both peptides enter intestinal epithelial cells by endocytosis, but only P57–68 enter the cells by lipid raft/caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Zimmermann et al. also confirmed the effect of M-β-CD on the entrance of P31–43 and P57–68-fluorescence labeled in CaCo-2 cells . The fact that a precise way of the entrance of these peptides has been discovered opens several new opportunity of finding drugs that can interfere with the entrance of the indigested gliadin peptides. These differences in the route of entrance have to be taken into account for future drug interference. Still not answered is the question how these peptides enter the cells. A receptor for both gliadin peptides has been looked for but not found . This is not entirely surprising as many bioactive peptides in nature do not need a receptor to enter the cells, as they can interact with the membranes directly . Noteworthy, P31–43, but not P57–68, can interact with a membrane mimetic environment .
Localization of gliadin peptides in the endocytic vesicles
Next, the localization of gliadin peptides in intestinal epithelial cells has been investigated. Interestingly, both gliadin peptides P31–43 and P57–68-liss have been localized in the early compartment of endocytosis in CaCo-2 cells after 30-min incubation, but only 3 h after treatment, there is segregation of P41–43/49, but not of P57–68, in the early endosomal compartment. This interesting segregation of P31–43 in the early compartment has been demonstrated by different groups and by different methods, both in epithelial cells in culture and in intestinal biopsies of CD patients and controls in ex vivo experiments [11–14].
Biological consequences of P31–43/49 segregation in the early endocytic compartment
The biological consequences of this segregation can be several and in different pathways. In fact, P31–49, unlike P57–67, bypassing HLA-DR-positive late vesicles and escaping antigen presentation at the basolateral membrane cannot stimulate gluten-sensitive T cells , preventing oral tolerance.
Moreover, the segregation in the early compartment of P31–43 peptide is due to a direct effect of the peptide on the endocytic trafficking. In fact, P31–43 is strikingly similar to a region of hepatocyte growth factor-regulated substrate (HRS) kinase, a key molecule regulating endocytic maturation, which is localized on the membranes of early endocytic vesicles .
The sequence similarity between gliadin peptide P31–43 and HRS is located in a small area of the proline/glutamine-rich domain of HRS. The COOH-terminal of HRS contains a clathrin-binding domain that binds clathrin to clathrin-coated vesicles and is one of the domains needed to localize HRS to the vesicle membranes. Both in CaCo-2 cells and in the celiac enterocytes, P31–43 localizes in the early endosomes and delays vesicular trafficking of several different cargos . Endocytosis has many effects on signaling; in fact, signaling pathways and endocytic pathways are regulated in a reciprocal manner. Consequently, endocytosis affects several cell functions, ranging from proliferation to actin organization, cell motility, and stress/innate immunity activation. Gliadin peptide P31–43 can increase IL-15, one of the major effectors of innate immunity in CD on CaCo-2 cell surface, not affecting mRNA or protein levels, but increasing the recycling of the complex IL-15/IL-15 receptor alpha to the membrane [4, 15, 16]. Biological effects of gliadin peptide P31–43 have been recently reviewed . Notably, impairment of the protein targeting and function has been described also when Frazer’s fraction of gliadin has been used, due to an interaction with the actin cytoskeleton [17, 18].
The block in the early compartment of gliadin peptides P31–43 or 49 can be overcome by cholera toxin B , by CD patients serum , or by linking the peptide to biotin . Strikingly, even when forced into the late compartment by biotin, for example, this peptide has some important biological effects on cellular stress and inflammation .
Other composts such as antibody against tissue transglutaminase (tTG)  or probiotics  can prevent gliadin peptides entrance in the cells, with reduced biological effects for several read outs, indicating that their entrance is crucial to the activation of cellular signaling. All together, these observations indicate that gliadin peptides P31–43/49 have important biological effects by interfering with the endocytic pathway. These data suggest that indigested gliadin peptides have strong biological activity not only by activating the adaptive immune response but also by initiating at the level of the intestinal epithelium stress/innate immune response.
Gliadin peptides transcytosis
Few studies are available on the destiny of gliadin peptides after they enter the cells in intestinal biopsies. Among these, Ménard et al. have established that P31–49 and 33 mer do enter the epithelial cell of intestinal biopsies from CD patients by intracellular pathway, excluding the paracellular entrance . Lebreton et al. have shown that in active celiac mucosa, gliadin peptides can be transcytosed from the apical of the intestinal epithelium to the basolateral side together with transferrin and IgA avoiding the late endocytic compartment. Transcytosis of IgA and transferrin is a well-known phenomenon, and transferrin increases in proliferating cells. The authors observe that this transcytosis can be prevented by antibodies against tTG and happens only when IgA–antigliadin and transferrin increase in the intestinal mucosa, basically when the disease is already in the active phase . Moreover, Schumann et al. demonstrated that transcytosis of 33-mer is Ras-related in brain (Rab 5) dependent (Rab 5 is a marker of the early endocytic compartment) and higher in active CD, than in patients on a gluten-free-diet and in controls . What happens to transcytosis of gliadin peptides before the disease is manifested is not known. On the other side, transcytosis of gliadin peptides in in vitro systems such as CaCo-2 cells strongly depends on the length of the peptides and integrity of the epithelial barrier [5, 6, 8]. Moreover, these observations decidedly exclude the possibility that gliadin peptides enter by a paracellular pathway and, although these data have been published several years now, this notion is still pointlessly debated in the field.
In vivo findings
In vivo findings about viability of gliadin peptides are very scarce. One interesting paper on the detection of gliadin peptide 33 mer in the feces of CD patients on a GFD fed with known amount of gliadin  indicates that 33-mer gliadin peptide is undigested by the intestinal brush border in vivo. Moreover, in a monkey model of gluten sensitivity, 33-mer peptide can be detected in the serum when the disease starts, indicating that this peptide can trespass the mucosa intact in vivo . No reports are present in the literature about the 25 mer (or 31–43/55) in vivo. The detection of indigested peptides in the feces can be used as a marker of diet complaint, a test that can be very useful in cases of doubt or for the monitoring of adolescent diet.
Although the study of gliadin peptides trafficking is an important way to understand the mechanisms of CD, many questions still have to be answered mainly regarding the specificity of the effects of gliadin peptides in CD cells and intestinal epithelium. Why gliadin peptides are so toxic for celiac disease patients? Is there a constitutive defect in CD cells that renders them more sensitive to gliadin peptides effects? Are they toxic in control cells? Is prevention of entrance of gliadin peptides in the epithelium enough to prevent the disease? Future study will be able to answer these questions.
brush border membranes
cluster of differentiation 4
human leucocytes antigen
hepatocyte growth factor-regulated substrate
messenger ribonucleic acid
- Rab 5:
Ras-related in brain
Sollid LM (2000) Molecular basis of celiac disease. Annu Rev Immunol 18:53–81
Wieser H (2007) Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol 24:115–119, Review
Sturgess RP, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ (1991) Cereal chemistry, molecular biology, and toxicity in coeliac disease. Gut 32:1055–1060, Review
Barone MV, Troncone R, Auricchio S (2014) Gliadin peptides as triggers of the proliferative and stress/innate immune response of the celiac small intestinal mucosa. Int J Mol Sci Nov 15:20518–20537, Review
Mamone G, Ferranti P, Rossi M, Roepstorff P, Fierro O, Malorni A, Addeo F (2007) Identification of a peptide from alpha-gliadin resistant to digestive enzymes: implications for celiac disease. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 855:236–241
Mamone G, Nitride C, Picariello G, Addeo F, Ferranti P, Mackie A (2015) Tracking the fate of pasta (T. Durum semolina) immunogenic proteins by in vitro simulated digestion. J Agric Food Chem 63:2660–2667
Caputo I, Barone MV, Lepretti M, Martucciello S, Nista I, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Sblattero D, Esposito C (2010) Celiac anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies interfere with the uptake of alpha gliadin peptide 31-43 but not of peptide 57-68 by epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1802:717–727
Zimmermann C, Rudloff S, Lochnit G, Arampatzi S, Maison W, Zimmer KP (2014) Epithelial transport of immunogenic and toxic gliadin peptides in vitro. PLoS One 9, e113932
Di Pisa M, Chassaing G, Swiecicki JM (2015) Translocation mechanism(s) of cell-penetrating peptides: biophysical studies using artificial membrane bilayers. Biochemistry 54:194–207
Vilasi S, Sirangelo I, Irace G, Caputo I, Barone MV, Esposito C, Ragone R (2010) Interaction of ‘toxic’ and ‘immunogenic’ A-gliadin peptides with a membrane-mimetic environment. J Mol Recognit 23:322–328
Zimmer KP, Fischer I, Mothes T, Weissen-Plenz G, Schmitz M, Wieser H, Büning J, Lerch MM, Ciclitira PC, Weber P, Naim HY (2010) Endocytotic segregation of gliadin peptide 31-49 in enterocytes. Gut 59:300–310
Barone MV, Gimigliano A, Castoria G, Paolella G, Maurano F, Paparo F, Maglio M, Mineo A, Miele E, Nanayakkara M, Troncone R, Auricchio S (2007) Growth factor-like activity of gliadin, an alimentary protein: implications for coeliac disease. Gut 56:480–488
Barone MV, Nanayakkara M, Paolella G, Maglio M, Vitale V, Troiano R, Ribecco MT, Lania G, Zanzi D, Santagata S et al (2010) Gliadin peptide P31–43 localises to endocytic vesicles and interferes with their maturation. PLoS One 5, e12246
Schumann M, Richter JF, Wedell I, Moos V, Zimmermann-Kordmann M, Schneider T, Daum S, Zeitz M, Fromm M, Schulzke JD (2008) Mechanisms of epithelial translocation of the alpha(2)-gliadin-33mer in coeliac sprue. Gut 57:747–754
Nanayakkara M, Lania G, Maglio M, Discepolo V, Sarno M, Gaito A, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Auricchio R, Barone MV (2013) An undigested gliadin peptide activates innate immunityand proliferative signaling in enterocytes: the role in celiac disease. Am J Clin Nutr 98:1123–1135
Barone MV, Zanzi D, Maglio M, Nanayakkara M, Santagata S, Lania G, Miele E, Ribecco MT, Maurano F, Auricchio R, Gianfrani C, Ferrini S, Troncone R, Auricchio S (2011) Gliadin- mediated proliferation and innate immune activation in celiac disease are due to alterations in vesicular trafficking. PLoS One 6, e17039
Reinke Y, Behrendt M, Schmidt S, Zimmer KP, Naim HY (2011) Impairment of protein trafficking by direct interaction of gliadin peptides with actin. Exp Cell Res 10:2124–2135
Reinke Y, Zimmer KP, Naim HY (2009) Toxic peptides in Frazer’s fraction interact with the actin cytoskeleton and affect the targeting and function of intestinal proteins. Exp Cell Res 15:3442–3452
Lübbing N, Rudloff S, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Zimmer KP (2011) Correction of gliadin transport within enterocytes through celiac disease serum. Pediatr Res 70:357–362
Luciani A, Villella VR, Vasaturo A, Giardino I, Pettoello-Mantovani M, Guido S, Cexus ON, Peake N, Londei M, Quaratino S, Maiuri L (2010) Lysosomal accumulation of gliadin p31-43 peptide induces oxidative stress and tissue transglutaminase-mediated PPARgamma downregulation in intestinal epithelial cells and coeliac mucosa. Gut 59:311–319
Sarno M, Lania G, Cuomo M, Nigro F, Passannanti F, Budelli A, Fasano F, Troncone R, Auricchio S, Barone MV, Nigro R, Nanayakkara M (2014) Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 interferes with gliadin peptides entrance in CaCo-2 cells. Int J Food Sci Nutr 65:953–959
Ménard S, Lebreton C, Schumann M, Matysiak-Budnik T, Dugave C, Bouhnik Y, Malamut G, Cellier C, Allez M, Crenn P, Schulzke JD, Cerf-Bensussan N, Heyman M (2012) Paracellular versus transcellular intestinal permeability to gliadin peptides in active celiac disease. Am J Pathol 180:608–615
Lebreton C, Ménard S, Abed J, Moura IC, Coppo R, Dugave C, Monteiro RC, Fricot A, Traore MG, Griffin M, Cellier C, Malamut G, Cerf-Bensussan N, Heyman M (2012) Interactions among secretory immunoglobulin A, CD71, and transglutaminase-2 affect permeability of intestinal epithelial cells to gliadin peptides. Gastroenterology 143:698–707
Comino I, Real A, Vivas S, Síglez MÁ, Caminero A, Nistal E, Casqueiro J, Rodríguez-Herrera A, Cebolla A, Sousa C (2012) Monitoring of gluten-free diet compliance in celiac patients by assessment of gliadin 33-mer equivalent epitopes in feces. Am J Clin Nutr 95:670–677
Mazumdar K, Alvarez X, Borda JD, Dufour J, Martin E, Bethune MT, Khosla C, Sestak K (2010) Visualization of transepithelial passage of the immunogenic 33-residue peptide from alpha-2 gliadin in gluten-sensitive macaques. PLoS One 5, e10228
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MVB and PZ both contributed to the conception, the design, the analysis, the interpretation of the data, and the drafting of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.