Skip to main content

Advertisement

Submicroscopic copy-number variations associated with 46,XY disorders of sex development

Article metrics

  • 2117 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Abstract

Background

Mutations in known causative genes and cytogenetically detectable chromosomal rearrangements account for a fraction of cases with 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD). Recent advances in molecular cytogenetic technologies, including array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), have enabled the identification of copy-number variations (CNVs) in individuals with apparently normal karyotypes.

Findings

This review paper summarizes the results of 15 recent studies, in which aCGH or MLPA were used to identify CNVs. Several submicroscopic CNVs have been detected in patients with 46,XY DSD. These CNVs included deletions involving known causative genes such as DMRT1 or NR5A1, duplications involving NR0B1, deletions involving putative cis-regulatory elements of SOX9, and various deletions and duplications of unknown pathogenicity.

Conclusions

The results of recent studies highlight the significance of submicroscopic CNVs as the genetic basis of 46,XY DSD. Molecular cytogenetic analyses should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients with 46,XY DSD of unknown origin. Further studies using aCGH will serve to clarify novel causes of this condition.

Introduction

46,XY disorders of sex development (46,XY DSD) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions that lead to genital abnormalities at birth, defective sexual development during puberty, and infertility in adulthood [1,2]. To date, mutations in several genes have been identified in patients with 46,XY DSD. Known causative genes for 46,XY DSD include ATRX, CBX2, DHH, DMRT1, GATA4, MAP3K1, NR0B1 (alias DAX1), NR5A1 (alias SF1), RSPO1, SOX9, SRY, WNT4, and WT1 involved in testicular development; AKR1C2/4, AR, CYP11A1, CYP17A1, LHCGR, HSD3B2, HSD17B3, POR, SRD5A2, and STAR involved in androgen production or function; and AMH, AMHR2, INSL3, RXFP2, and the HOXD cluster involved in genital organ formation [1,3,4]. In addition, various chromosomal rearrangements have also been associated with 46,XY DSD [1,3]. However, mutations in known causative genes and cytogenetically detectable chromosomal rearrangements have been identified in only 20% to 30% of cases [1], indicating that other genetic or environmental factors play an important role in the development of 46,XY DSD.

Recent advances in molecular technology, including array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have enabled high-throughput analysis of clinical samples. Of these, aCGH is highly useful to detect copy-number variations (CNVs) in the genome of individuals with apparently normal karyotypes [5,6], and MLPA can identify various copy-number alterations in specific disease-associated loci [7]. NGS primarily focuses on identification of nucleotide substitutions. Molecular cytogenetic analyses using aCGH or MLPA revealed the importance of CNVs as the cause of several genetic disorders, although accumulating evidence shows that submicroscopic CNVs can also occur as functionally neutral polymorphisms [6]. Here, we review recent reports on molecular cytogenetic analyses of patients with 46,XY DSD.

Findings

46,XY DSD-associated CNVs identified by molecular cytogenetic analyses

In this review, we summarize the results of 15 recent studies [8-22]. We found these papers through a PubMed search using the key words ‘disorders of sex development’, together with ‘comparative genomic hybridization’, ‘multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification’, or ‘copy-number variations’. We focused on original articles, in which aCGH or MLPA was used to identify submicroscopic CNVs in patients with 46,XY DSD. The 15 studies showed 28 deletions and 4 duplications as genetic causes of 46,XY DSD, as well as several other CNVs whose association with the disease phenotype remains uncertain (Table 1, parts a and b, and Table 2) [8-22]. Notably, White et al. identified pathogenic CNVs in 3 of 23 patients with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis [18], and Igarashi et al. detected CNVs in 3 of 24 patients with various types of 46,XY DSD [9]. These data suggest the significance of submicroscopic CNVs in the etiology of 46,XY DSD. All CNVs, except for those on the sex chromosomes, were detected in the heterozygous state. Parental samples of the CNV-positive patients were analyzed in some cases, confirming the de novo occurrence or maternal inheritance of all CNVs examined (Table 1, parts a and b).

Table 1 46,XY DSD-associated deletions identified by molecular cytogenetic analyses
Table 2 46,XY DSD-associated duplications identified by molecular cytogenetic analyses

Deletions encompassing known 46,XY DSD-causative genes

Submicroscopic deletions encompassing known causative genes were identified in 18 patients (Table 1, part a). These deletions ranged from 74 kb to 18.0 Mb and caused haploinsufficiency of LHCGR, DMRT1, NR5A1, WT1, or HOXD cluster [8-17]. Of these deletions, those encompassing DMRT1 or NR5A1 were relatively common. Notably, CNVs in cases 3, 16, and 17 were 10 to 18 Mb in length. These results imply that in some cases, deletions ≥10 Mb can be missed by standard karyotyping, although this method is expected to detect CNVs ≥5 to 10 Mb [11]. Actually, the results of karyotyping are affected by the quality of samples and the genomic position of CNVs [11]. Submicroscopic deletions in the 18 patients were associated with both isolated and syndromic 46,XY DSD. Syndromic DSD resulting from these deletions were primarily ascribed to contiguous gene deletions. For example, a deletion in case 16 encompassing WT1 and PAX6 caused 46,XY DSD, Wilms tumor, aniridia, and mental retardation, which is collectively referred to as WAGR syndrome. This WAGR syndrome has been described in several patients with cytogenetically detectable deletions at 11p. The size of submicroscopic deletions in 18 patients roughly corresponded to patients’ phenotypes (isolated or syndromic); 7 of the 9 patients with deletions ≥1.0 Mb manifested additional clinical features such as mental retardation, short stature, and facial dysmorphism, whereas such features were not reported in 9 patients with smaller deletions (Table 1, part a). On the other hand, syndromic 46,XY DSD was also caused by deletions of a single gene with complex functions. Indeed, finger anomalies observed in DSD patients with HOXD cluster-containing deletions are consistent with the fact that HOXD genes, particularly HOXD13 [23], control the development of limb and external genitalia [4]. Although submicroscopic deletions involving known causative genes were frequently identified in patients with syndromic 46,XY DSD (Table 1, part a), previous molecular cytogenetic analyses may be biased toward patients with complex phenotypes. Thus, further studies are necessary to clarify the precise frequency of pathogenic CNVs in patients with isolated and syndromic 46,XY DSD.

Deletions in the upstream regions of known 46,XY DSD-causative genes

Submicroscopic deletions that reside adjacent to known causative genes also underlie 46,XY DSD. To date, deletions involving the upstream regions of SOX9, GATA4, or NR0B1 have been reported to cause 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis (Table 1, part b) [10,12,18-21]. These deletions are predicted to disrupt the cis-regulatory machinery of genes involved in testis formation. For example, SOX9 is regulated by SRY and plays a critical role in the development of testis and long bones [1]. SOX9 abnormalities lead to 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis with or without campomelic dysplasia [1]. It is known that SOX9 expression is tightly regulated by multiple cis-acting enhancers in the upstream and downstream regions and that elimination of the enhancer(s) leads to tissue-specific dysregulation of SOX9 [10,18-20]. Previous studies have mapped SOX9 enhancers for craniofacial tissues to a genomic interval >1.0 Mb apart from the coding region and a testis enhancer to a 32.5-kb region at a position 607 to 640 kb upstream from the start codon [10,18-20]. These enhancer regions seem to contain transcription factor binding sites which are essential to maintain SOX9 expression during development. Since microdeletions in the SOX9 upstream region can result in complete gonadal dysgenesis similar to that observed in patients with SOX9 amorphic mutations, elimination of the distal enhancer seems to completely abolish SOX9 expression on the affected allele [10,18-20]. Deletions in the upstream regions of GATA4 and NR0B1 are also likely to encompass cis-acting enhancers of these genes [12,18,21]. Identification of deletions in the upstream or downstream regions of genes provides clues regarding cis-regulatory mechanisms of each gene.

Duplications encompassing known 46,XY DSD-causative genes

Submicroscopic duplications involving NR0B1 were identified in several patients with 46,XY DSD (Table 2) [10,18,22]. NR0B1 is a transcription factor gene isolated from the dosage-sensitive sex reversal adrenal hypoplasia congenita critical region on Xp21 [24]. Overdosage of NR0B1 is a well-known cause of syndromic 46,XY DSD in individuals with large X chromosomal rearrangements [25]. Recently, molecular cytogenetic analysis by Smyk et al. has shown that submicroscopic duplications encompassing NR0B1 can lead to 46,XY DSD as a sole clinical manifestation [21]. Copy-number gains of NR0B1 were predicted to perturb testicular development by downregulating the protein expression of SF1, WT1, and SOX9 [18].

CNVs of unknown pathogenicity

Genome-wide copy-number analyses identified several submicroscopic CNVs that could be associated with the development of 46,XY DSD. Ledig et al. performed aCGH analysis on 87 patients with 46,XY DSD and identified 31 CNVs which have not been described as polymorphisms [10]. While 7 of the 31 CNVs encompassed known DSD-causative genes, the other CNVs have not been implicated in DSD. Ledig et al. proposed that several genes, including GKAP1, NCOA4, and CTNNA3, are novel candidate genes for 46,XY DSD. Furthermore, Tannour-Louet et al. [11] analyzed 116 patients with 46,XY and 46,XX DSD and 8,951 control individuals, and identified 25 CNVs that may underlie DSD. Of these, 13 CNVs were detected in individuals with 46,XY karyotype. Further studies on large cohorts will clarify the pathogenicity of these CNVs.

Clinical applications of molecular cytogenetic technologies

Molecular cytogenetic analyses using aCGH or MLPA would be beneficial for patients with 46,XY DSD, because identification of pathogenic CNVs could help to predict the disease outcome and possible complications of patients. For example, patients with deletions encompassing WT1 have a high risk of Wilms tumor and renal failure. Furthermore, detection of disease-associated CNVs significantly improves the accuracy of genetic counseling for patients’ families. Molecular cytogenetic analyses, together with mutation screening using NGS, should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients with 46,XY DSD of unknown origin.

Summary and conclusions

Recent studies revealed that submicroscopic CNVs constitute a fraction of the genetic causes of both isolated and syndromic 46,XY DSD. ACGH and MLPA appear to be useful for molecular diagnosis of patients with 46,XY DSD. Furthermore, genome-wide copy-number analyses using aCGH will serve to identify novel causes of 46,XY DSD.

Abbreviations

aCGH:

array-based comparative genomic hybridization

CNV:

copy-number variation

DSD:

disorders of sex development

MLPA:

multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

References

  1. 1.

    Achermann JC, Hughes IA (2011) Disorders of sex development. In: Williams textbook of endocrinology, 12th edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA

  2. 2.

    Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF, Hughes IA (2006) Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. International Consensus Conference on Intersex. Pediatrics 118(2):e488–500, doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0738

  3. 3.

    Ahmed SF, Bashamboo A, Lucas-Herald A, McElreavey K (2013) Understanding the genetic aetiology in patients with XY DSD. Br Med Bull 106:67–89, doi:10.1093/bmb/ldt008

  4. 4.

    Del Campo M, Jones MC, Veraksa AN, Curry CJ, Jones KL, Mascarello JT, Ali-Kahn-Catts Z, Drumheller T, McGinnis W (1999) Monodactylous limbs and abnormal genitalia are associated with hemizygosity for the human 2q31 region that includes the HOXD cluster. Am J Hum Genet 65(1):104–110, doi:10.1086/302467

  5. 5.

    Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20(2):207–211, doi:10.1038/2524

  6. 6.

    Lee C, Iafrate AJ, Brothman AR (2007) Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat Genet 39(7 Suppl):S48–54, doi:10.1038/ng2092

  7. 7.

    Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G (2002) Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 30(12), e57

  8. 8.

    Richard N, Leprince C, Gruchy N, Pigny P, Andrieux J, Mittre H, Manouvrier S, Lahlou N, Weill J, Kottler ML (2011) Identification by array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) of a large deletion of luteinizing hormone receptor gene combined with a missense mutation in a patient diagnosed with a 46,XY disorder of sex development and application to prenatal diagnosis. Endocr J 58(9):769–776

  9. 9.

    Igarashi M, Dung VC, Suzuki E, Ida S, Nakacho M, Nakabayashi K, Mizuno K, Hayashi Y, Kohri K, Kojima Y, Ogata T, Fukami M (2013) Cryptic genomic rearrangements in three patients with 46,XY disorders of sex development. PLoS One 8(7), e68194, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068194

  10. 10.

    Ledig S, Hiort O, Scherer G, Hoffmann M, Wolff G, Morlot S, Kuechler A, Wieacker P (2010) Array-CGH analysis in patients with syndromic and non-syndromic XY gonadal dysgenesis: evaluation of array CGH as diagnostic tool and search for new candidate loci. Hum Reprod 25(10):2637–2646, doi:10.1093/humrep/deq167

  11. 11.

    Tannour-Louet M, Han S, Corbett ST, Louet J-F, Yatsenko S, Meyers L, Shaw CA, Kang S-HL, Cheung SW, Lamb DJ (2010) Identification of de novo copy number variants associated with human disorders of sexual development. PLoS One 5(10), e15392, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015392

  12. 12.

    Harrison SM, Granberg CF, Keays M, Hill M, Grimsby GM, Baker LA (2014) DNA copy number variations in patients with 46,XY disorders of sex development. J Urol 192(6):1801–1806, doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.040

  13. 13.

    Barbaro M, Cools M, Looijenga LHJ, Drop SLS, Wedell A (2011) Partial deletion of the NR5A1 (SF1) gene detected by synthetic probe MLPA in a patient with XY gonadal disorder of sex development. Sex Dev 5(4):181–187, doi:10.1159/000328821

  14. 14.

    van Silfhout A, Boot AM, Dijkhuizen T, Hoek A, Nijman R, Sikkema-Raddatz B, van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA (2009) A unique 970 kb microdeletion in 9q33.3, including the NR5A1 gene in a 46,XY female. Eur J Med Genet 52(2–3):157–160, doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2009.02.009

  15. 15.

    Brandt T, Blanchard L, Desai K, Nimkarn S, Cohen N, Edelmann L, Mehta L (2013) 46,XY disorder of sex development and developmental delay associated with a novel 9q33.3 microdeletion encompassing NR5A1. Eur J Med Genet 56(11):619–623, doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.09.006

  16. 16.

    Schlaubitz S, Yatsenko SA, Smith LD, Keller KL, Vissers LE, Scott DA, Cai WW, Reardon W, Abdul-Rahman OA, Lammer EJ, Lifchez CA, Magenis E, Veltman JA, Stankiewicz P, Zabel BU, Lee B (2007) Ovotestes and XY sex reversal in a female with an interstitial 9q33.3-q34.1 deletion encompassing NR5A1 and LMX1B causing features of genitopatellar syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 143A(10):1071–1081, doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31685

  17. 17.

    Le Caignec C, Delnatte C, Vermeesch JR, Boceno M, Joubert M, Lavenant F, David A, Rival J-M (2007) Complete sex reversal in a WAGR syndrome patient. Am J Med Genet A 143A(22):2692–2695, doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31997

  18. 18.

    White S, Ohnesorg T, Notini A, Roeszler K, Hewitt J, Daggag H, Smith C, Turbitt E, Gustin S, van den Bergen J, Miles D, Western P, Arboleda V, Schumacher V, Gordon L, Bell K, Bengtsson H, Speed T, Hutson J, Warne G, Harley V, Koopman P, Vilain E, Sinclair A (2011) Copy number variation in patients with disorders of sex development due to 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis. PLoS One 6(3), e17793, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017793

  19. 19.

    Benko S, Gordon CT, Mallet D, Sreenivasan R, Thauvin-Robinet C, Brendehaug A, Thomas S, Bruland O, David M, Nicolino M, Labalme A, Sanlaville D, Callier P, Malan V, Huet F, Molven A, Dijoud F, Munnich A, Faivre L, Amiel J, Harley V, Houge G, Morel Y, Lyonnet S (2011) Disruption of a long distance regulatory region upstream of SOX9 in isolated disorders of sex development. J Med Genet 48(12):825–830, doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100255

  20. 20.

    Kim GJ, Sock E, Buchberger A, Just W, Denzer F, Hoepffner W, German J, Cole T, Mann J, Seguin JH, Zipf W, Costigan C, Schmiady H, Rostasy M, Kramer M, Kaltenbach S, Rosler B, Georg I, Troppmann E, Teichmann AC, Salfelder A, Widholz SA, Wieacker P, Hiort O, Camerino G, Radi O, Wegner M, Arnold HH, Scherer G (2015) Copy number variation of two separate regulatory regions upstream of SOX9 causes isolated 46,XY or 46,XX disorder of sex development. J Med Genet. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102864

  21. 21.

    Smyk M, Berg JS, Pursley A, Curtis FK, Fernandez BA, Bien-Willner GA, Lupski JR, Cheung SW, Stankiewicz P (2007) Male-to-female sex reversal associated with an ~250 kb deletion upstream of NR0B1 (DAX1). Hum Genet 122(1):63–70, doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0373-8

  22. 22.

    Barbaro M, Cicognani A, Balsamo A, Löfgren Å, Baldazzi L, Wedell A, Oscarson M (2008) Gene dosage imbalances in patients with 46,Y gonadal DSD detected by an in-house-designed synthetic probe set for multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis. Clin Genet 73(5):453–464, doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.00980.x

  23. 23.

    Warot X, Fromental-Ramain C, Fraulob V, Chambon P, Dollé P (1997) Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. Development 124(23):4781–4791

  24. 24.

    Zanaria E, Muscatelli F, Bardoni B, Strom TM, Guioli S, Guo W, Lalli E, Moser C, Walker AP, McCabe ER et al (1994) An unusual member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily responsible for X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita. Nature 372(6507):635–641, doi:10.1038/372635a0

  25. 25.

    Ogata T, Matsuo N (1996) Sex determining gene on the X chromosome short arm: dosage sensitive sex reversal. Acta Paediatr Jpn 38(4):390–398

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and by the Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, from the National Center for Child Health and Development, and from the Takeda Science Foundation.

Author information

Correspondence to Maki Fukami.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MK and MF wrote and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Disorders of sex development
  • Copy-number variations
  • Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
  • Comparative genomic hybridization